The Daily Drip

What's up with the what's up. Traced to the source.

Builders: Free rebuilt prompts Get The Drip Pack — $27 Local businesses: Free website teardown

The wire · traced · first seen Nov 1, 10:32 UTC

Pangram and other AI detectors affect how authors write

Some authors change their wording or add typos to make their writing look human to AI detectors.

L2 · reported1 source3 claims checked

What we checked

Every claim below was walked down the source ladder. The rung is how close the source is to the thing itself; the tense is the source's own.

  1. announced L2 · reported

    Authors drop em dashes to look human to AI detectors.

    per Techmeme (L2)
  2. announced L2 · reported

    Authors avoid “not X, but Y” phrasing to look human to AI detectors.

    per Techmeme (L2)
  3. announced L2 · reported

    Authors add typos to look human to AI detectors.

    per Techmeme (L2)

Not confirmed

How often authors make these changes, whether they affect detector results, and how accurately Pangram identifies AI writing are not established.

Who should wait

Writers considering changes to their style solely to avoid detection should wait for evidence that those changes work.

Sources

One edition each morning. Every claim linked to its source.

Send me The Daily Drip each morning. I understand opens and clicks are counted to decide whether the edition is worth continuing, and I can unsubscribe in one click.